Should there be an attack at a theater showing the film, be it from a state sponsored group, a lone-wolf terrorist, or a nut job, the theater owners would be pilloried by the Plaintiff bar.
Of course attacks can come at any time and any place - think Aurora Colorado. As was asked in a different context but applies here: "Have we no shame?"
I wish there was an over/under way to bet on Mr. Cosby's audience size. Dredging up memories from decades ago is ripe for injustice. Celebrities have access to bushel baskets of sex. The basketball star Wilt Chamberlain claimed 20,000 liaisons. Frank Sinatra had his share of companionship, and Dr. Martin Leuther King received tangible rewards from ladies in the church. Any woman can obsess about her relation with the celebrity. One woman did not get the part on his TV show and is now claiming rape of some sort.
I believe that Mr. Cosby will have a full audience and that he will satisfy that audience. We have an obligation to stand up against extreme PC activists. They are evil incarnate. look at the Tawana Brawley Case for example.
By the way, Rock bands require birth certificate proof that girls going backstage, often for sex, are old enough to consent.
I have no knowledge of Mr. Cosby's personal life. But if sex is so available to celebrities, actual rape would be wasteful of energy and a threat to the celebrity itself. View Comment
Some years ago the wonderful basketball player, Wilt Chamberlain, claimed to have nailed 20,000 different women. And the great singer, Frank Sinatra, had intercourse with thousands. And many ladies rewarded Dr. Martin Luther King. So a celebrity like Bill Cosby could very well have had great success with the ladies.Rape seems far fetched just because of the numbers. Why would he resort to rape when sex by the bushel basket was just given to him. The classic case is the model who coveted an acting roll on Crosby's popular series. Her using sex to get a roll makes far more sense than rape.
Why rape now? Now that Cosby is a fallen star, women will assert that their commerce was tricked from them or force was involved. Ladies do that. In the 1080s I was the president of a club for single middle age people. The women were widows or divorcees. The expired husbands were all saintly "my best friend". The divorcees were all married to son of guns, not fit for polite company. The question then became why God struck down only good guys.
It is a shame that a seemingly good man, mr. Cosby, is ruined because the media has no sense of comparison or reasoning ability. Look how foolish Senator Franken, and otherwise brilliant guy, in the Jamie Leigh Jones case. View Comment
When the NFL lowered the boom on Mr. Rice they took millions of dollars of expected future family income from her. She might have to support her family.
Domestic discord should be handled outside of activist hoopla. Violence is regrettable, but so is a breakup of a salvageable marriage.
Those of us who are married know that a spouse can drive us to distraction at times. It amazes me that only 10% of homicides involve spouses. I wish Mr. and Mrs. Rice the very best. View Comment
See the reference to culture? Then take the blue ribbon and hang the report writers in the public square. Blue ribbon reports are worthless because there is pressure to get recommendations, no matter how inane, to justify the work of the commission. View Comment
The crash came from demographics. Populations were aging rapidly and populations wanted to save for their retirements. Using market values, houses were overpriced and leverage was played out. When the market came to its senses about the overpriced houses, the bubble broke. Before the break lenders could have a flip to a higher price buyer even for lier-loan borrowers..
There was an element of disgusting greed by people using leverage to walk up values of their housing. It is only fair that poor people be given a shot at the racket. In general not everybody can become rich doing mortgage games. Our academic community fell asleep at the switch.
Don't get me wrong I think Andrew Cuomo is a jackass. View Comment
I think the world of Congresswoman Lowey. She is terrific. Thus she broke my heart with her moronic statement about Indian Point.19,000 people were swept away by the Japanese tsunami, but anti nuke folks scared the Japanese populous about Fukushima. Nobody was killed or hurt by the radiation from Fukushima. Nothing was harmed by the release of some radiation into the very large ocean. You can lose an airplane in an ocean. Yet the Japanese people have to foot the bill for Rube Golberg barriers to radiation going into the ocean. I thought the Japanese people were more intelligent than Americans. I was wrong about that. View Comment
I came out of the post office the other day and looked up the street at Ossining's architecture and the flowering trees (Dogwoods? I am an idiot with respect to trees.) It was a pleasing view. So how can the character of downtown be preserved and growth enhanced? Obviously putting in a Walmart would not work as there is not enough flat land for a parking lot and some of our 19th century structures would have to go.
I also enjoy the restoration of the handsome bank building as condos. The developer did a beautiful job in my opinion. And I root for the Keenen House and wish that HealthSmart could freshen up its store. I wonder what magic Ms. Castadi has in mind. . View Comment
Rare uncoordinated events follow Poisson distributions. There is a finite probability of several events in a limited time period as what happened to the railroad. Then commissions are appointed. The members have to prove their work by making recommendations. The Rogers Commission for the Columbia space shuttle explosion is the classic example. They shut down the space program for awhile and required tons of money in expenditure. The value of their work was nearly zero, and we don't know on which side of zero as the Columbia shuttle burned up seven years later. The root cause of both accidents was the same.
And when there is mention of culture one knows the cuckoo birds are in control. Please, no more commissions. View Comment
Back in the 1970's women as a group made 59 cents for every dollar earned by men as a group. The difference was explained to my satisfaction by the different ways men and women adhere to the job market. Women lose time and seniority credits to bearing and rearing children. The "improvement" to 77 cents resulted from women aging and being beyond their peak child bearing years and unwarranted political pressures. Fair markets work against unjust discrimination. If an empl0yer can get a qualified woman worker at a 23 per cent discount from a man worker, he would be a fool not to hire the woman.
Our president is an ignorant fool on this issue and many others. He is painful to hear. But Republicans are far worse on average. The 1983 Social Security reforms gave us surplus FICA funds. Those extra revenues were scheduled to phase out, but every Republican just ignores this and denies the replacement revenue to government. View Comment
Alcohol was an aroma and a "taste" that is unmistakable. Ms. Kennedy's pill was just a pill. Her initial reaction to the police was consistent with her not being aware of her taking a powerful sleeping pill.
There was a wrong prosecution of a teach in Croton who toutored children in her home. This case should not have been brought. It cost her her marriage and years of anguish. It was horrible, and the woman was not from a famous family.
Our district attorney office is too fascistic for my liking. View Comment
There is a fascinating physiological condition for the human body, the ability to fall asleep. A few years ago I had a medical problem that restricted my sleep to about 90 minutes at a time. What a relief when I could get a 4 hour block of sound sleep. The body can literally flick a switch and put a person to sleep. There is a fancy name for people who just fall asleep in an instant. I suspect that many if not most of the DWI fatalities are due to the falling asleep problem. After a night of drinking is late at night. I was not drinking, but I was very tired when I fell asleep on the Taconic. The washboard along the side of the road woke me up and really scared me.
Talk of knowing that one can tell when one is about to shut off, except for being fatigued, are misguided in my opinion. Ms. Kennedy had an accident. Let's celebrate the result of no one getting hurt or killed.
No one dislikes Robert Kennedy Jr. more than I. But one's bias for or against Kennedys should be set aside in this case. View Comment
There are two cases to think about. One involves a professional football player, a wide receiver, accused of rape in Minnesota. The accuser took the stand and wept as she told of her ordeal. The defense attorney had her confirm that she was on the floor of the bathroom and the football player used his powerful hands to spread her legs to enter her. The defense attorney asked her to step down. She asked the judge if she had to, and the judge said yes. The defense attorney escorted the young woman to a model of the bathroom and opened the door thereto. She then blurted out "This isn't right; it is much too small." The defense attorney called the carpenter who said all measurements were within a sixteenth of an inch of the actual bathroom and the football player was aquited.
The community was split on the case with some taking the "she said" as true and other taking the "he said" as true. The man was lucky to be able to prove the negative. But he was under a cloud of suspicion, and his defense was not cheep. The relevance to the case at issue for the Ossining teacher was that the Minnesota girl's claims were investigated and she had no obvious mental problems. What is chilling is that a seamingly normal girl had no understanding of the damage that she did.
The second case involves the female teacher in Croton who foolishly tutored students in her home. The Westchester DA indited and got a conviction based on the braggadocio of a punk. It was horrible. This problem with our DA and our populous is serious. The blatant assumption of conclusions in the comments hereto show no protection from rational procedure. The Central Park Jogger case is another example of the lack of clear thinking. When the true assailant was found, the case against the wrongly convicted boys showed all kinds of problems with the case.
Mr. Gullotta's use of the term "looser teacher" is as offensive as using the term "looser Jews" with respect to the holocaust. Shame on him. View Comment
Citizens can have no confidence what so ever in the result. Political activists require that the she said in he said/ she said cases be believed even though there are many cases where the she said is false. Could the girl in this case be just furious that her crush was getting married to somebody else? Prosecutors make use of the political bias to threaten imprisionment and get their quary to plead. The need to register as a sex offender is horrific, but prosecutors care only in getting a notch on their belt. It's sickening. View Comment
It was just a few years ago that the teacher in Croton was wrongly convicted. She did jail time and her marriage was destroyed by the perversion of our DA office. Lawyers and opportunists have taken billions from Catholic parishioners, and groups make their livings based on Ophra-Show level theories as expressed in other comments below. Unless there is actual physical evidence no prosecution should be ensue in this case. Testimony in these cases is unreliable and juries (in fact nobody) has no skill in judging credibility. In the Sandusky case, the jury believed fellows who said their high powered lawyers were to help with the media. Those high payed lawyers took the rubes of Pennsylvania to the cleaners for $60 million. View Comment
Please remember the false prosecution of the woman in Croton who tutored in her house. Prosecutions based on testimony gathered by a district attorney office with blood on its hands should be disregarded without strong physical evidence. It is impossible to overstate the danger from prosecutors out to protect children. They skip the step of logical analysis and just go for conviction. View Comment
There are several problems with breast cancer awareness campaigns.
1) The presumption that every treatment saved a life. Mostly it does, but sometimes not. The cancer might be so slow growing that the lady would die of something else first. A mammogram technician said something to my ex wife. By the time she drove home, she convinced herself that she was to die shortly and that it was my fault. I told her that she should wait for the radiologist to review the film. It might be nothing; then a biopsy might be nothing; then the prognoses is favorable. The radiologist found nothing. We divorced for other reasons.
2) The massive, in terms of numbers, heartache from false positives. "We need another look' weighs heavy on women.
3) Basing funding decisions not on medical factors but on the emotional response to breasts. View Comment